5 Things You Must Know About McKinney-Vento
Published July 20, 2009 @ 01:30PM PT

Among the jumble of homeless assistance legislation, federal and state programs, nonprofit service centers, and the like - there is one piece of federal legislation that stands out as the cornerstone of the homeless assistance movement: the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act.
These are the FIVE THINGS you need to know about McKinney-Vento:
1. It was the first federal response to the growing homelessness crisis in the United States. Passed in 1987, the text established that homelessness is an immediate and growing problem that the nation had an obligation to address.
The original text of the bill stated:
"The Congress finds that -
1. the Nation faces an immediate and unprecedented crisis due to the lack of shelter for a growing number of individuals and families, including elderly persons, handicapped persons, families with children, Native Americans, and veterans;
2. the problem of homelessness has become more severe and, in the absence of more effective efforts, is expected to become dramatically worse, endangering the lives and safety of the homeless;
3. the causes of homelessness are many and complex, and homeless individuals have diverse needs;
4. there is no single, simple solution to the problem of homelessness because of the different subpopulations of the homeless, the different causes of and reasons for homelessness, and the different needs of homeless individuals;
5. due to the record increase in homelessness, States, units of local government, and private voluntary organizations have been unable to meet the basic human needs of all the homeless and, in the absence of greater Federal assistance, will be unable to protect the lives and safety of all the homeless in need of assistance; and
6. the Federal Government has a clear responsibility and an existing capacity to fulfill a more effective and responsible role to meet the basic human needs and to engender respect for the human dignity of the homeless."
2. To this day, McKinney-Vento remains the largest federal investment into preventing and addressing homelessness in the nation.
Largest in terms of dollars spent, largest in terms of people served, largest in various types of the word.
McKinney-Vento established 20 homelessness assistance programs out of 9 federal agencies and last year, nearly $2 billion was distributed through these assistance programs.
3. McKinney-Vento established the Interagency Council on Homelessness, a group of representatives from 15 federal agencies charged to design a comprehensive approach to reduce, prevent, and end homelessness in the country.
This Council exists today, and met for the first time under the Obama administration on June 18, 2009 to discuss permanent supportive housing for the nation's veterans. HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis serve as Chair and Vice Chair of the Council.
4. The McKinney-Vento Act provides services to homeless children, including access and the right to attend public schools. As a condition of the Act, public schools are required to register homeless children as well as designate a statewide homeless coordinator to review policies and create procedures to ensure that homeless children are able to attend school.
5. In May 2009, Congress passed the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act, which reauthorized the McKinney-Vento programs. It was the first significant reauthorization in nearly 20 years.
While some of the details about how HEARTH will practically affect McKinney-Vento programs have yet to be seen, the goal of the HEARTH Act was to make transformative changes to the homeless assistance programs under the Department of Housing and Urban Development, as well as decisively shift the focus of these programs from managing homelessness to preventing and ending homelessness.
A couple quirky facts: McKinney and Vento are actually Stewart B. McKinney (R - CT) and Bruce Vento (D - MN). The two were known for a their dedication to the needs of those less fortunate, and are considered pillars of this legislation. Both died of unnatural causes: McKinney died of AIDS complications and Vento died of mesothelioma, brought on by asbestos exposure.
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
So You Wanna be a Homeless Advocate?
-
HUD Secretary Donovan Talks Homelessness
-
The State of Homelessness in the U.S.
Comments (4)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Author
-
Catherine An is the media relations and communications specialist for the National Alliance to End Homelessness, a nonprofit, non partisan organization dedicated to ending homelessness in the United States. When she’s not managing all-things media or blogging for the Alliance, Catherine enjoys watching re-runs of West Wing and Studio 60, the Nordstrom anniversary sale, and baking yummy things for her fabulous co-workers.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email


















Look at the problem today compared to 1987 and ask yourself how the originators of the act, Stuart McKinney and Bruce Vento would feel today if they were still alive.
The intent of the the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act was a decent and honorable one but the execution of this Act has been an abysmal failure. The Act essentially led to the creation of HUD's Continuum of Care which has resulted in the mother of all containment systems and duped millions into believing that homelessness could be solved by using a plan based on managing homelessness.
We are reaping the consequences of two decades of battling the effects of homelessness on people and communities. McKinney-Vento led to the mobilization and deployment of thousands of programs and millions of people that went into battle against a very tough opponent (homelessness), with pitch forks and axes. No real battle plan, no exit strategy, no hope to win...just a bunch of pitchforks and axes flying around that made it look like we were fighting the good fight. The outcome? We got our butts handed to us. More homeless then ever. 1.2 million CHILDREN homeless. It's bad. real bad.
Its like if your local hospital used candy stripers to run around and give magazines and hugs to patients lying in beds on a morphine drip. The real problems never get addressed and people churn around in the system for a long time. Some get out but many just die. That's what happens today in America after spending billions and billions of dollars. Millions of people churn around the homeless system, some get out (about 20% MAYBE), some die but most just CHURN, stuck in it.
But here is the scary part...the new HEARTH Act evolved not from a new battle plan with sound strategies built on core values to defeat (solve) homelessness, but to put a giant dome over the battle and call it housed. It is a colossal REACTION to the failure of McKinney Vento. It is NOT, in my 19 years of being on the front lines of this thing, a real plan to defeat homelessness.
Posted by NORTH COUNTY SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE on 07/20/2009 @ 06:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'd agree with, and go even further than, the comment above. While the intent of McK-V may have in some way been honorable at some time, it has become so distorted that it's shameful.
Why does Ms. An feel compelled to extol this Act? I'd like to think that national advocacy groups would work to push for policy improvements, not be satisfied with, at best, mediocrity, which is what our nation's response to homelessness has become.
NAEH's blatant opposition to expanding the definition of homelessness that would include the millions of homeless families and teens is inexplicable. Pointing out that McK-V includes services to homeless children (underlined) is disengenuous given NAEH's vigorous opposition on expanding the definition to include them.
Why the deceptive sales pitch for McK-V "accomplishments" and the resource-draining Continuum of Care "structure" which weakened any concerted effort to truly address the decades of decimating this nation's housing and poverty policies?
One would wonder if the HUD money allegedly funneled to NAEH has anything to do with this rah-rah for McK-V?
Posted by HEAR US on 07/21/2009 @ 08:57AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
To HEAR US and Jody - Your comments are right on target.
It really is quite mind-boggling. I talk to people every day who are involved in programs and efforts to "help the homeless". Both those needing help and those helping. To hear them talk about the problem and the solutions and then to hear Nan Roman, CEO of NAEH talk about the problem and solutions its like the two are on different planets. The policy makers and national advocates are so far disconnected from the front lines and the real world, its no wonder we have 10TIMES more homeless children today then when the McKinney-Vento Act was created 20 years ago.
For the past several years while NAEH and HUD put great emphasis promoting and expanding policies on ending chronic homelessness, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of children became homeless! Now the HEARTH Act evolves in a massive reaction to this massive crisis.
You really want to solve this thing?
Abandon the old containment model completely including the new policies that promote putting a giant dome over this battle and call it "housed".
Redesign using a completely different model, one that is based entirely on SOLVING homelessness using strategies based on REAL WORLD information from people on the front lines, not from disengaged advocates and policy makers who think they know what is best.
Get ALL sectors of the communities involved in the solution. Forge puposeful partnerhsip them around a SIMPLE plan to defeat homelessness in their community.
Posted by NORTH COUNTY SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE on 07/21/2009 @ 01:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
In my state, there are many families (most headed by single moms) that do not qualify for any of the existing "homeless programs". These families have special needs children and are unable to secure full-time employment, due to the extensive needs of the children. They are either un- or under-employed and don't meet the criteria of having "full-time" employment and/or the "minimum required income (for program admission)".
Our most desperate families are being overlooked. Even faith based organizations aren't helping them - they have "criteria" their homeless families need to meet too!
Societies are ultimately judged by how well they care for "the least of these". History will not be kind to us, unless we REALLY start speaking (and acting) out on behalf of our neighbors. We must ignore all of the talking points and start listening to our hearts and consciences.
Posted by Jody Mack on 07/21/2009 @ 09:27AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.