America's Aging Homeless
Published June 22, 2009 @ 06:36AM PT

Picture your grandparents. Now picture your grandparents living homeless on the streets.
Heartbreaking, right? I'm sure you'd rather not think about it.
Perhaps this is why a growing homeless sub-population is flying under the radar. Instead of living large post-retirement, many elderly individuals are living on the streets or in shelters. They are the elderly homeless, a particularly vulnerable population that is all too often left out of the conversation about homelessness in America.
The more one thinks about the prospect of living without a home as an elder, the more disturbing it becomes. Being homeless can be physically demanding, requiring one to stand in lines for shelter beds or walk to different parts of a city for different services. Elderly people are also more likely to be in poor health than the general population, which complicates matters even more. Access to medicine and proper care is difficult when you're living without a permanent address.
An recent article in the Berkeley Daily Planet described this recent trend among those seeking services:
More generally, an aging population-the latest mark of baby boom demographics-swells the homeless count as well. Add on the current economic crisis, and older adults who were teetering on the edge or not even so close-those who lost a job, a pension, their mortgaged house or rented apartment-suddenly face the rudest of awakenings, tossed into the homeless mix.
As Baby Boomers age, and older Americans fall on tough economic times, greater attention certainly needs to be given to the unique needs of older homeless individuals. As Jeannette Ilagan writes in this paper, helping homeless elders "will require multidisciplinary approaches that offer age-sensitive services, have minimal barriers to access, and are accommodating for the frail and multiply diagnosed senior."
The "Golden Years" shouldn't have to mean panhandling.
Share this Post
Related Posts
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email




















I do not have to picture my grand parents. I am of the baby boomer generation. Believe it or not one reason Baby boomers became homeless is because "Government Officials who should be aiding every person who qualifies, deny general relief or town welfare"
All of the states in New England has a form of town aid based upon lack of income. Not age if you have a child, but income. All it takes for a grandmother, is the same as it takes for an family or a individual to be unable pay their rent-one repair.
The Social Security could be as low as $300 a month. If you are talking about anyone older than myself, take into account women work lower paying jobs than men, so they get the lowest amount of SS.
The general assistance finds ways to toss out valid claims. It little matter' s if you are in Mass, Conn, or Maine, it sounds the same. You make to much money. You just moved-disregard the constitutional cases back in 1969. You are stupid enough to believe that does not apply to yourself. I am going to tell you that. ETC ETC.
The official of all states with GR or GA will boldly lie to you face, They get paid to turn those who seem incapable of fighting, away. This is the disabled, the elderly and the foolish young.
The system needs to be fixed not just for the elderly, Black or white, or the Latinos, but it needs to fixed for all people.
One of your reports said their were 16 states of people on SSI paid less then the cost of rents. Imagine what happens when they have repair a car or a washing machine. I do not have to imagine I am there. People working for minimum wage are there.
As in the mist of writting this, I just had a fifty year old male call the hotline, He was saying he has been on the housing waiting lists over two years he is disabled but because he found high paying jobs when he was working he doesn't even qualify for rides to his doctor. And he has seen a couple expecting a baby be given preference.
I say all people who qualify for housing should be aided within thirty days. That is the time it takes in North Dakota.
Waiting two to 6 years to help those in need now, Should not happen.
The horses you see in my photo are going to stamp out injustice. They are named, "End" is the first horse. The second one answers to "Poverty". And the third horse is called "Today".
That can happen when everyone or 10% of the population believes we can wipe-out poverty of one of the top ten richest counties in the would. It will happen, when We call for ending poverty for 100% of the people, and ending 100% of the need.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 06/22/2009 @ 09:36AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
According to several studies I've seen, the average lifespan expectancy for homeless people is just under 50 years old. This really needs to be considered in this topic.
So sending elders outdoors is sure a way to thin the herd, it would seem. I'm now about 10 years beyond the average homeless lifespan, having been illegally forced into the predicament. And have had to face the harsh reality that there's hardly a better way to disable a legal adversary than to do that to them, since there's an almost complete absence of any real, practical help once you can get them out there. And it's next to impossible to continue fighting from here on your own.
The other day, I was talking with an acquaintance. He's not homeless, but is "friends" with some of us that are. In passing, I said something about "longevity" but not at all even on the topic about lifespan or homelessness. Ironically, for some reason, he "heard" that to mean a reference to my own mortal prospects and he immediately added remarks about how par for the course my demise would be (and others here in similar predicament and age ... even adding how "no one would bat an eye" at that.
And he's right.
Posted by SlumJack Homeless on 06/22/2009 @ 11:13AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We need more voiceless from both the homeless themselves and the people who help them without earningg anymoney from homeless, heat less and the hungry. They have likely been their themselves.
One thing I believe about studies is they must be checked out. If that person been out a few years, or since 35 years of age, I believe it. Otherwise I question even liberal studies. I tear apart conservative studies.
As a citizen of the world, its my DUTY not to believe propaganda. I do not wish to be anyone's puppet.
I know life on the streets are hard, on the body. I also know some people do not get displaced until after their 50's. They are the exception to older folks life expectancy.
What I wonder is meant by the article is if Shannon is trying to tug at the readers heart strings? Some of us our string-less. We believe the world will provide. If it does not we turn our heads. Still nestle in the false belief, the world will provide.
Forget about the little dog and its older female owner who
were burnt to death in her car in CA this year. Its better to trust that the system works fine. It does not. bit we need to hear these word 10 to 30 time's before we check it out.
Posted by jan Lightfootlane on 06/22/2009 @ 02:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Another reason why Senior Citizens and even some of those in Middle Age are finding their ways into homelessness is because of how lax the laws (and thus ethics) have been about the pensions they were lead to expect at their retirements only to have their employers basically steal the money from them. A person can't accurately or responsibly plan for their retirement if their employer is lying to them about them having a pension to rely upon when they reach retirement. This is NOT the retirees' fault.
One big problem that's going to face those who are older is that shelters, particularly when at or nearing capacity, will effectively cherry pick who gets a space. Someone whose health is compromised, someone who has a disability or who otherwise is going to need more resources for whatever reasons is going to be less likely to get a space and far more likely to end up left on the streets. There's also the closely related issue that many shelters, esp. the drop-in homeless shelters, do a very poor job of keeping residents safe from each other and someone who's elderly or otherwise frail may not just have access issues (like with climbing several flights of stairs or getting in and out of a top bunk) but they may be "easy pickings" for the not-so-savory types that sometimes find their way into such shelters.
Then too there's the interconnected issues of how our "assistance" programs discriminate in choosing whom they will or won't help - typically won't help or only provide very limited (and only non-cash) help to those who are childless no matter what their situation. Now with immediate homelessness, a person *may* (dependent upon local funding and rules) qualify for a housing voucher, but those places tend to be magnets to stuff like drug dealers, prostitution and sex offenders so they're really rough places to live. Otherwise, they're likely to be stuck hoping they get a spot on the applicable housing wait lists and survive till their names are called (and it can be a wait of years).
Ultimately, two things are at the root of why there are this many problems at getting the necessary help in a timely manner. The first being that our nation continues to take a realistic assessment of what is true poverty in this country so it can develop realistic assistance programs with adequate funding and reasonable rules. The second being that our nation seems to simply refuse to honor Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/22/2009 @ 04:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Sorry for the typo. In the last paragraph, that should read: The first being that our nation continues not to take a realistic assessment of what is true poverty in this country so it can develop realistic assistance programs with adequate funding and reasonable rules.
Posted by Danetta Amschler on 06/22/2009 @ 05:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.