How to Distmantle a Tent City
Published April 15, 2009 @ 06:55PM PT
It was a reporter's dream: a state with a Hollywood governor, a city with a former NBA star Mayor. In the shadows of that city's skyscrapers, along the banks of the River America, lay a modern day "Hooverville." In recent months, this tent city scituated on the outskirts of Sacramento attracted non-stop media attention- domestic, international, and Oprah- as the "face of the American economic crisis."
But today, this encampment of 150 to 200-or-so homeless people (most of them chronically homeless) is gone. Mayor Kevin Johnson ordered its removal last Thursday. Today, the last of the people who called this tent city home have no choice but to move on.
Despite the media fascination with Sacramento's tent city, life for its residents has not been easy, according to the LA Times:
The tent city sprawls along the river in small clusters of ersatz neighborhoods. Walker and her neighbor, Charly Hine, 38, have pitched their tents at the distant edge to stay away from noise and trouble.
Gibson's tent is in a separate, small, neat grouping. One neighbor displays an American flag and a goose with the word "welcome" on its breast. It is a favorite subject, its owner says, of news photographers. Another has a mailbox and a gate.
The largest and most raucous neighborhood is composed of about 70 tents closest to the street.
Near noon, Tammie and Keith Day are drinking beer around a cold fire pit, worrying about how she'll get her diabetes medication and fretting about whether officials will shutter the tent city.
"We're homeless and being evicted?" Tammie fumes. "Now I've heard everything."
Clearly, the media glare has left Mayor Kevin Johnson uncomfortable and unsure of how to handle the situation. After an countless of meetings and summits, he announced that the current tent city would be closed. At the same time, he announced, the city is considering the feasibility of a permanent homeless encampment and looking to increase the number of city shelter beds.
Right. First clear out the tent city and then decide what you're going to do with the people. Makes perfect sense.
Suffice to say, Sacramento homeless advocates are not happy. In fact, things got heated today as the clearing out got underway, according to the Sacramento Bee:
Sister Libby Fernandez of Loaves & Fishes, which provides services to homeless men, women and children, led a group of advocates demanding a moratorium on camping citations and pushing for a place where people can camp legally and with basic services including toilets and garbage pickup.
"We've been campaigning for this for more than a year," she said. "Now we're back to square one again."
Fernandez and others said they will engage in nonviolent "civil disobedience" if campers are forced to leave, and will risk going to jail to make their point.
So the big question that remains is this: where are these evicted homeless campers going to live?
The answer? Another tent city, of course.
Most of the 150-200 campers are moving just a short walk down the American River levee to a growing tent city (Sacramento Tent City Version 2.0, we'll call it). Although the encampment is on private property, police stay it still violates the city's law against camping. Could this mean it's just a matter of time before these homeless people are evicted again?
You know what they say. You can take the people out of tent city, but you can't take the tent away from the people.
Stay tuned... this story isn't over yet.
[Picture from the Sacramento Bee]
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
Homeless Living In Storage Units
-
The Tent City Debacle: Sanction or Remove?
-
Will Tiny Houses Provide Shelter from the Economic Storm?
Comments (49)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Shame on the City of Sacramento, Ca.
Posted by leatrice brantley on 04/15/2009 @ 09:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mayor Kevin Johnson is the lowest form of life. Rev. Bookburn - Radio Volta
Posted by Rev Bookburn on 04/16/2009 @ 02:55PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Disgusting. Mayor Johnson is a former NBA player; these are some of the most overpaid individuals on the face of the earth. Guess he doesn't have to worry about where to lay his head tonight.
If you'd like to tell him how you feel about this, here's his contact information:
Mayor Kevin Johnson
City of Sacramento
915 I Street, New City Hall, 5th Floor
Mail Code 09100
Sacramento, California 95814
916-808-5300 - Phone
916-264-7680 - FAX
E-Mail: mayor@cityofsacramento.org
Let's let him know that right-minded people will not tolerate this abuse of citizens!
Posted by Romy Carver on 04/16/2009 @ 04:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Romy,
I sent the Mayor an Email protesting his actions, but in a suggestive way as to alternatives available. I can't believe that an African American Mayor would further hurt the Homeless! But then again, our Black Mayor, Kevin Sanders, helped to close DOWN our only Homeless Shelter (Mission) in the City (Asbury Park), instead of supporting it. It was a very good place, too!
By the way, the email you left just opens up the Web Site.
Posted by Stephen Wider on 04/20/2009 @ 08:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Take this idea from Military.com a few steps further and involve more agencies.
VA Housing Program Offers Vets HopeApril 13, 2009Baltimore Sun
BALTIMORE, Md. -- Keith Church left the Navy in 1974 after a two-year stint, worked for years as a maintenance mechanic and never considered asking for veterans benefits.
But in December, Church, 54, was jobless, coping with health problems and on the brink of homelessness -- "couch surfing" with friends, he says -- when he turned to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for help. Within a few months, he moved into an apartment, thanks to a VA program that started in Maryland this year to help homeless veterans.
"I don't know how I would make it without the VA," he said. "I was at the bottom, health-wise and mentally. They are my only source now for everything. Slowly but surely, I am getting back on my feet." He is working with a VA case manager and is volunteering most weekdays at the VA hospital in Baltimore.
The Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing program uses vouchers to help homeless veterans move into rental units.
"The whole idea is to take these veterans from poverty and homelessness and give them the health and support they need," said Patricia Lane, the VA's coordinator for health care for homeless veterans in Maryland. "These housing vouchers are the blessing at the end of a long-walked road for these vets."
The VA hospitals in Baltimore and at Perry Point in Cecil County serve as the gateway to the assistance program and screen veterans to determine their eligibility. "This program is so well-received that landlords are actually calling and asking me for VASH folks," said David Mahaney, director of housing and community development for Cecil County.
Baltimore County is overseeing 105 vouchers worth about $750,000 annually, and Cecil County has 70 vouchers worth about $470,000, officials said.
Lois Cramer, administrator at Baltimore County's housing office, said she has assigned more than 80 vouchers and expects to use all 105 by summer's end. Cecil has issued more than 50, Mahaney said.
"Often, these men and women are just out of sync and need the stability of home and ongoing case management," Cramer said.
Typically, the veteran pays 30 percent of their income for rent, with the voucher picking up the remainder. The program has helped a 31-year-old single mother with a $7-an-hour job and $117 in monthly veterans benefits who has just leased an apartment, and a 25-year-old married father of two coping with a disability. He moved his family into a Sparrows Point home within 60 days of applying for a voucher. He pays $318 of the $1,048 monthly rent, with the voucher picking up the difference.
"The tenants usually choose a location close to employment, transportation and health care," Cramer said.
Census data shows that 71,627 veterans live in Baltimore County, with about 3.6 percent of them living below the poverty line. Nationwide, veterans make up a third of the homeless population, according to the VA.
"These vets don't want a handout, but they need help," Cramer said.
The need will continue, particularly as veterans return from Iraq and Afghanistan, officials said.
"The things we saw overseas come back and bother us later in life, especially the Vietnam vets," said Church, the Navy veteran. "When they start coming back from this war, look out."
The voucher program streamlines what can be a complicated housing process, said Meg Ferguson, who coordinates veterans affairs in Baltimore County. "Veterans are proud, and it's difficult getting them to accept help," she said. "The good news is that a lot will work their way out of a crisis, turn in the voucher and transition into another program. Then the voucher can go to another in crisis."
© Copyright 2009 Baltimore Sun. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.Posted by bob silvey on 04/16/2009 @ 06:43PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Glad to see MY state at the front of real help!!!!
Posted by Scooter C on 04/19/2009 @ 04:03PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"Nationwide, veterans make up a third of the homeless population, according to the VA."
Sad. Too bad our government doesn't take some of the money it pumps into killing people in other countries and put it into caring for those people who thought they were signing on to protect their country... or those drafted who didn't get a choice.
I like your idea, Bob. I wonder if the VA could step in on behalf of perhaps up to a third of these people...
Posted by Romy Carver on 04/17/2009 @ 09:12AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
My father's family lived outdoors in a tent for close to a decade through no fault of their own. They were law-abiding, hardworking people like many of today's homeless who found themselves without permanent housing. It seems there has always been a huge gap between the haves and have-nots in a society that rewards some out of all proportion to their fellows and casts those fellows adrift to fend for themselves. To then evict people who have nowhere else to go is ludicrous, unfeeling, and inhuman! Do the powers that be think people ENJOY being homeless?
I would propose that all the derelict buildings and foreclosed properties be made available to families to occupy and that priority is given to ensuring that they have income sufficient to pay basic expenses. LIVING BEINGS need to count more than dollar signs.
Posted by Jamaka Petzak on 04/17/2009 @ 01:15PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
She has diabetes and she's drinking a beer?
Posted by Jenny Clagett on 04/17/2009 @ 07:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yah, that was my thought. And it was "near noon." There's a basic "wrong-livelyhood" kind of thinking with a lot of those folks that puts them there. When they want to change their lives and stop being victims, they will.
Posted by Isa Yonah on 04/18/2009 @ 09:18AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I don't think any of us are in a position to judge a homeless person who is diabetic and drinking a beer. I would imagine that someone who is sleeping in a tent and freezing their butt off every night, then waking up to hopelessness and eviction, and wondering where their next meal is coming from, may find a beer to be a comfort. Should diabetics drink beer? Maybe not, but that's not the point.
As a woman, she will be at much bigger physical risk from sleeping on a street corner somewhere than she will from drinking a beer. She will be much more vulnerable to physical and sexual assault without the protection from her community which the mayor has taken away. She will be sleep deprived, with nowhere to go, and may end up farther away from health care resources because of this.
If I were in her position, maybe a beer would make the pain go away for a little while, or make me feel like I can be like everyone else for a while. I don't know, I just don't think we are in a position to sit on our butts at our computers being comfortable and fed, and judge a human being who is in a major life crisis for drinking a beer.
Posted by Romy Carver on 04/18/2009 @ 09:39AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree with Romy. It so easy for us to tell them to change their lifestyles or to get a job; many don't realize that getting a job is the problem. Large scale homelessness, like that seen in neo-Hoovervilles, is a symptom of systemic problems, not individual choices.
Posted by Matt Gieschen on 04/19/2009 @ 10:29AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The Government should help to provide housing for ANY Homeless Person! Here we are watching AIG Executives get up to $6 Million Bonuses for BANKRUPTING a Company (Or it would have been other than the Government's intervention) and giving AIG over $200 Billion in "Aid"! Aid which basically helps the RICH!
Yet, we now have Millions of people, most of whom formerly worked, or were in the Military trying to protect the rest of us, who are now homeless all over the U.S.
What is WRONG with this Country? We have made it a Crime to become Homeless! Yet it's the fault of EVERY Person alive in the USA that Homelessness exists here. But it's NOT the fault of the Homeless themselves. It's the fault of the rest of us for not having a sufficient system that prevents Homelessness, before it happens.
And Rom is 100% correct! We are spending literally Trillions of dollars on the Iraq & Afghanistan "Military Actions" (There was no War legally declared since WWII), and about 80% of that money in going towards Corporate Profits, not to support the Troops! If we pulled out of both Countries, and had the U.N. send Peace Keeping Troops for a while, everyone would be better off long term.
All of the money being spent on getting Corporations and their top employees rich should be spent on well thought out programs to create Jobs and Affordable Housing. Instead, the Country is turning into two classes, the Super Rich top 5-10%, and the rest of us. And 300 million people fight for 25% of the Wealth, while Military, Energy and Medical & Pharmaceutical Companies, and their Top Executives (And Stockholders) get more & more Wealthy!
The Poor end up Homeless over in Overcrowded & Under maintained conditions, while what used to be the Middle Class People live now from month to month trying to just keep up with their bills ..... Then they fall into Poverty, as well!
We are headed into becoming another 3rd World Country, and it's NOT far off until it happens. Millions of Jobs are going to India, China, and a hand full of other Countries, while the U.S. sinks into s deeper & deeper abyss that is rapidly beginning to look like Hell!
But WHY don't 5 Million People March on Washington? The Mayor of Sacramento isn't the ONLY one to blame for the Homeless being evicted. It's the People of California, as well! What has HAPPENED to their Values that they LET this happen to their fellow Human Beings? And it's not unique in California, either.
The Same "Baby Boomers" who I grew up with, and who were responsible for ending the Vietnam War, are now turning their backs of the Homeless, and instead seeking "A better quality of life" for themselves. But the Rich are out to get THEM, as well! And they will.
WHEN are we ALL going to Wake Up and realize that when there are ANY Homeless People in our Country, it is because we ALL are failing to do what's right? Blaming it on those who are suffering is immoral, unethical and against ALL Values of any Religion or Society, yet it continues, and is getting worse.
And the Rich must STOP Taking and living with constant GREED as their main Motives, and Give Back to the rest of Society, and God! That IS the Key to this all. And if they don't, they should be forced to do so. Boycott their Products one by one, until they GET the Message where it hurts them.
Peace Pilgrim's philosophy is that anyone who has more than what they need just to survive on is hurting the rest of Society. And if everyone Used only what they needed, then no one would EVER have to suffer, except under extreme conditions, like during natural disasters or when ill. And it's NOT Communism, or Socialism, to want Everyone to have a Right to a Home, Food, an Education and a Job, as well as Health Care! It's something that should be a God given RIGHT that we honor!
Peace,
Steve
Posted by Stephen Wider on 04/17/2009 @ 09:27PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I couldnt have said that better myself. If anyone hears of any protest on this issue at the CA Capitol... please post it here and let us know. I will be there for sure.
Posted by Sharon Blasingame on 04/18/2009 @ 11:26AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
BRAVO, Stephen. And I am a great admirer of Peace Pilgrim as well. We need to walk our talk, as she did, and truly put ourselves in the position of others who are suffering -- the reasons may be complex and as myriad as the sufferers, human and other, themselves. The SUFFERING, however, is universal, pandemic, and senseless, and we should all be ashamed that it continues, while doing what each one of us can to ameliorate it.
Posted by Jamaka Petzak on 04/19/2009 @ 06:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Well, Stephen, you can't say (and I'm playing Devil's Advocate here) that the homeless are ENTIRELY blameless for their situation. A series of bad choices made in life can lead to a certain situation; granted, some of those choices may have been made out of (perceived) necessity, because they didn't see that other choices were available to them--and sometimes, they were right. But to a certain extent, they signed up for this. I know I did when I wound up homeless in Spokane, WA, over 15 years ago and having to go stay in a mission for five months. I made bad choices; if I hadn't made them, if I had made other choices, I'd have taken another path in life and would have ended up somewhere else. But I didn't.
All that being said, however, they do deserve some kind of help in making different choices so that they won't continue to be homeless. And I, too, can sympathise with the diabetic woman drinking a beer--it's not a smart thing to be doing, but sometimes you just need to dull the pain a bit. It may even be the only way she has to warm up.
Posted by William Feagin on 04/19/2009 @ 06:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
YES, people do make bad decisions, but I don't think that should make them "Deserve" to become Homeless. But in reality, about 80% of the Homeless are usually Transitionally Homeless, because of a loss of a Job, a Divorce, Medical Bills, coming home from a War, etc. The remaining 20% may have psychological problems like Depression, DMD, etc.
I've made "Mistakes" myself and almost ended up Homeless. I'm now on disability, and have a Rent Subsidy, otherwise I'd be Homeless now. I previously worked for 30 years, though. But lots of bad luck (And some bad decisions) along the way (And Companies going out of business) caused me to be 57 Y.O. and with no pension coming because I wasn't at one company for 10 years. One bad decision in 1980 may have totally destroyed my future ... But I was going through a Divorce at the time, and wasn't thinking straight.
But I believe that having a roof over one’s head should be a RIGHT, not a privilege. And anyone who works as many years as I have, should never be homeless. Or anyone who has a disabling disease which prevents them from working. And in really bad economic times, like now, just because a person loses their job and CANNOT get another one, they shouldn’t become Homeless, either.
The 1948 United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights included a Home, Food, a Job, and continuing Education all as “Basic Human Rights.” And until we all agree and make it happen, our Society will be mostly to blame, not those who “Fall through the Cracks”. As far as Mental Illness goes, it was shown in a statistics study that about 75% of the homeless who had mental problems didn’t have those problems UNTIL they became homeless. Homeless is the ultimate stress, and can cause you to go nuts, or just get depressed. It creates a lot of guilt, as well, which mostly comes from expectations of Society that one should be able to “Pull themselves up by their bootstraps” and just continue on. But what would Jesus do if he was here? Or any Religious Icon?
What Human Being Doesn't make bad decisions? How about all of those who caused the Financial Crisis that we're in NOW? Are those who are affected by them also supposed to suffer?
Posted by Stephen Wider on 04/20/2009 @ 07:35AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What is this non-functional state Legislature in California doing by leading us through months of anguish while attempting to cope with financial problems, while repeatedly blocked by Republican members in voting with Democrats to pass the budget.
When can the real needs of the people be met? The mentally ill go on without proper care, in the state funding matters, reductions will only reduce the number of available health providers and make it harder to find help for the mentally ill.
Posted by Mary Acosta on 04/22/2009 @ 11:23AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Is everyone serious? help these people? lets give them all breaks so they can have their chance to be an american; over-consume and under-think! These poor homeless people that use fewer resources are being left out of our race to kill the earth. Poor them. I have been homeless for over two years in the past, however I am now a disabled veteran and homeowner. I think that everyone else could use help from homeless people. Instead of trying to get the homeless out of their tents and into houses lets get people out of their houses and into tents. Who has the RIGHT to a roof over their head? The blending of our lives with those of the global south(third world) is inevitable, our new option is to prepare to live like everyone else(one global shantytown), or enact population control. I am ready. My boisterious laugh will echo up from the sewer and fill the largest corporate skyscraper with fear. We poor, We homeless, We hungry, We manipulated, We sleep in the rain under dumpsters, We last soon to be first, We have seen that we are the majority and you will not keep mother earth's bounty for yourself
Posted by james keener on 05/08/2009 @ 11:47AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
December 2003. A social enterprenuer fasts from a tent in Chapel Hill NC. Having returned from Russia where he's leveraged a microfinance bank, he's calling for economic rights in the US.
I try to hel raise awareness and pitch a pastiche of Capra's Meet John Doe at an ABC News reporter. In the movie a journalist clings to her job by inventing John Doe, the activist calling for shared values and a common purpose. In my inversion the activist was real, the journalist imagined.
"Nice try" he wrote "but she'd probably lose her job for writing anything that might upset the wealthy ABC sponsors"
That's the point at which we decided to work together on social enterprise in international development and shortly after John Edwards opened the Center for Poverty Work and Opportunity in the same town. As you may recall John was the One America advocate.
Jeff
Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 04/18/2009 @ 01:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
In the context of housing, what's also relevant in the story above is that the last project in Ukraine was a proposal for a repatried community with scant housing and opportunity for income generation supported through microfinance and transformational lending.
http://www.p-ced.com/projects/ukraine/crimea/
In an interview with a diaspora leader, after we launched in London he describes the swords to ploughshares objectives and the more inclusive economic model we promote.
http://www.iccrimea.org/scholarly/economicdev.html
Jeff
Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 04/18/2009 @ 01:34AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'll try that link again. The one above fails:
http://www.iccrimea.org/scholarly/economicdev.html
Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 04/18/2009 @ 02:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
http://hexayurt.com is a real solution to these kinds of temporary housing crises. It's a fully open source design for a temporary house - not a tent - a temporary house.
Inexpensive and easy to build, the local community could organize to help people into much better shelter for the duration of their homelessness.
Please give it a look.
Posted by Vinay Gupta on 04/18/2009 @ 06:54AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I wish I had land, I would donate the space for the homeless.
The old Christian saying comes to mind,
"by the grace of God, go I".
BUT have you looked at church property, lately.
Acres of grass. Space that could be organised for the homless.
Donations have slowed and dwindled because every penny counts toward keeping ourselves from being homeless. Seeing how the homeless are treated, does not make those who are close to homeless, feel optomistic. Those that CAN do something, don't, due to fear and|or embarrassment in their Christian community.
I've seen it. I've also seen Churches give their all, when the parrishners had little to give. They are the true Christians, who practice what they preach. Our country, as a whole, have lost this "helping Hand" mentality.
The movie "Slumdog Millionaire" showed the good & brave of caring people and the real dogs of society. Good movie.
And yet it still goes on, even here in the USA.
If we're not careful, we'll have the "Dirty 30s" again (The History channel). When blind eyes refused to see the poverty conditions, existing right here in the states, its disgraceful. We Torture our own citizens!!!!
Why should I be surprised. We're killing our planet, even after we know the truth! The entire world population will soon be homeless and starving.
Posted by Scooter C on 04/19/2009 @ 04:53PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That looks like an interesting alternative to a tent. But as it is, unfortunately, Cities all over the Country are closing Tent Cities, and this particular "Home" would have to be approved by cities (Permits, etc.) for it to be allowed to remain. It's not fair, or humane, but the mentality is to just "Get rid of the homeless" so that they're invisible, and then they don't have to be dealt with!
There has to be a totally different mentality developed regarding Homelessness, otherwise it will increase and continue to be seen as the Person's fault, not Society's fault.
The key is that when a "Local Community" tries to help, the City moves against them and tears these types of things down, whether it's a Tent or something else. Here in Asbury Park, NJ, they had a Homeless Mission closed down because the minority of people who are well off didn't want it to "Reduce their Property Values". And the Mission was a proven one that had another location in Morristown since the 1890's.
Posted by Stephen Wider on 04/20/2009 @ 07:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
In a city like Baltimore, where we have approximately 40,000 vacant homes and people who so desperately need housing, this issue is near and dear to us at BSLW. Recently, the police cleared out a small "tent city" that was located in the shadows of M&T Stadium, home of the Baltimore Ravens -- this was done with little fanfare and we haven't seen any press coverage.
Nothing about this country's economic policies regarding housing has made sense for 20+ years -- when is it going to change???
Posted by Baltimore Slumlord Watch on 04/18/2009 @ 07:01AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think what needs to happen, at least as a start, is that every time a tent city is torn down, or displaced persons are otherwise abused, and one of us hears about it, we need to post it on here and get the word out, pressure the media to get the word out, then all of us must tell everyone we know and work as a team to pressure (embarrass) the hell out of the official, i.e. rich person in power, who made the decision.
We can work together to make them miserable until they do the right thing. We can send a message that we know what's going on and we are not going to stand for it! What do you all think? Be like a watchdog group?
Posted by Romy Carver on 04/18/2009 @ 09:48AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Romy is right! Things like Tent Cities being closed MUST be exposed very clearly through the Media. But where I live, the Media even hides things like that happening. Media now mostly takes the Conservative stance, which blames everything on the individual.
And, of course, with that Stadium there, it would "Look Bad" to have the Homeless close by. Maybe if they left it there, some people going to games might either give the people some money, or call the Mayor and insist that they be helped. But when it's just "Erased", few people do anything, because they no longer "See" it!
I don't really know WHAT can change the Public's attitude towards Homelessness! Maybe we are real close to Armageddon, or the Second Coming, because God's wrath seems to have always come when the mass of Earth's Population has gotten too Greedy, Evil or has abandoned their Values totally. Apathy is almost as bad, because we have a DUTY to help our fellow Human Being (And animals & the earth itself).
Posted by Stephen Wider on 04/20/2009 @ 07:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
why can't they just target the troublemakers? i'll never understand how the government grants people the right to live and be free, and yet gives them no place to do it.
Posted by Catherine Turley on 04/18/2009 @ 09:45AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"Hooverville?" That's so 1932. The Sacramento encampment was a Bushville, plain and simple. Call it what it is.
Posted by Robert J Sunde Jr on 04/18/2009 @ 09:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You can't Blame Bush for Tent cities!!!
1930's IS happening again. We've not learned a thing from the past. This time the whole world is involved. We should be leaders, not whiny and blaming.
WE and our government are responsible.
I still remember the stories my grandfather told me.
Horrific. Even the History Channel ran a reminder this afternoon 04-18-09.
Posted by Scooter C on 04/19/2009 @ 05:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The Sacramento Mayor's action was what happens when Godlessness predominates our culture; namely, the current (I would hope very soon the ex-) Mayor is: a non-person, without mercy, compassion & humanity, and utterly void of all the qualities that make up a God-fearing and truly human being. Hopefully, he'll pay for his overt action.
Posted by Sue Stockdale on 04/18/2009 @ 11:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
they treat people like dogs. jjjeeezzz! leave them alone and give them food stamps so they can survive.
Posted by jack eich on 04/18/2009 @ 03:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
That prompted an old memory, Jack.
Lyrics first:
"And they´re African, Mexican, Caucasian, Indian,
hungry and hopeless Americans.
The orphans of wealth and of adequate health,
disowned by this nation they live in.
And with weather worn hands on bread lines they stand,
yet but one more degradation.
And they're treated like tramps while we sell them food stamps
this thriving and prosperous nation."
Then Don Mclean
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyFEXgpp2VY
Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 04/18/2009 @ 04:18PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I have been keeping informed about this situation for a number of months, now. I recently wrote to Mayor Kevin Johnson and told him that he was wrong on this issue. Here is a copy of my original e-mail to him and down below is his response to me (dated March 25, 2009):
Dear Mayor Johnson,
I recently read that you made certain comments about the homeless
people living in a tent city in your city. I have read most of that
transcript and wanted to comment. You obviously have made some very good
points, since you seem to be very much aware of the housing and job
situation in Sacramento. In your comments, you stated that there had to
be a balance being compassionate but also having zero tolerance (see
below):
"We have over 200 people that are, unfortunately, camping out along the
river. And I think what's happening in our city is we have to make sure
that we have tough love. We have to find a balance being compassionate
on one hand, and then also a zero tolerance. These are safety hazards,
not just for the homeless population, but for the people who want to
enjoy the river."
I understand that as mayor of a major American city, your first
responsibility is to the welfare of the people living in that city.
However, before you start talking about "zero tolerance" and "tough
love", perhaps you could see about getting these folks into some
affordable housing units. The great majority of these people have been
laid off due to the current recession, and most of them simply want to
work and get back on their feet. I know about this, because I went
through a period of homelessness as a result of the last recession. I
spent time living in a shelter and it was not the happiest experience.
My hope is that you do something to help these folks get through the
current economic crisis. Zero tolerance should only be used for people
who don't wish to work or to be part of a productive society, and not
for people who are down on their luck through no fault of their own.
Thanks for taking the time to read this e-mail.
Sincerely,
Matthew Cloner
Seattle, WA.
-----------------
matthew,
thank you for taking time to contact me. i appreciate your feedback.
i do not support a sweep of the tent city without compassionate,
responsible options.
i am convening a task force on homelessness and hope to have positive,
comprehensive solutions in the next two weeks.
best,
kevin
Posted by Matthew Cloner on 04/18/2009 @ 08:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This is sad, the sprouting up of Bushvilles was sad enough but to see this displacement tactic to clean up the river so prosperous couples can go for romantic walks along the river without being bothered by the reality of the problems resulting from the current economic situation is even worse. Fuck you Kevin Johnson, fuck you.
Couldn't Obama use his book sales to give shelter to these Americans?
Posted by paul hamilton on 04/18/2009 @ 10:21PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Homelessness in America can be eliminated with the construction of low income housing and other solutions (pre-fab homes, etc). But this means that our national priorties need to be altered. Homelessness can happen to anyone. And what goes around comes around. Kevin Johnson is the mayor of Sacramento today, but 15 years from now he might be the one who is living in a tent somewhere.
Posted by Matthew Cloner on 04/19/2009 @ 09:21AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Move Over Campers…. More Disabled Will Be Moving In….
Let me start by saying Mayor Johnson can not take all the blame alone. Governor Schwarzenegger, as of January 2009 raised the co-pays on medicines for those on Medicare/Medicaid. They did give the disabled/seniors a cost of living raise of 5.8% on January 1, 2009 (the largest raise we have ever received) but as of May 1, 2009 he is taking it back. (By the way we only got a 2 week notice this was going to happen which will put some people in a bind because they committed that extra money to pay bills.) President Obama is giving the disabled on SSI a one time stimulus payment of $250, due to arrive late May 2009.
This is how it breaks down for me. I got a $37 raise 1/1/09. May 1, I loose the $37 raise. Obama gives me $250 stimulus money in May. Ok… for the remainder of this year, May – Dec, = 8 months x $37 = $296 lost for the year. So much for the $250 stimulus check. Hmmm I wonder if Obama is aware of this or what he would say. On top of all that, I still have an I.O.U. for my tax rebate from 2007 – 2008 taxes (which is what I depend on to tag my car) except they don’t call it an I.O.U….it says they “will pay IF the funds become available”. Not holding by breath on that one.
They don’t care that the cost of living rose on us like everyone else, i.e. rent, utilities, food, vehicle registration, mandatory auto smog, medicine co-pays, gasoline, taxes, etc. And the disabled are back to living on 2008 wages that were set by 2007 cost of living (COLA). For me that is $7,284 a year. Can you live on $7,284 a year? So if anyone can not understand why there are so many disabled homeless living on the streets, there you go.
I’m just really tired of hearing that the homeless are there because they have addiction problems because very few had them before they got there. When you take away the ability for a person to have hope and dignity and then government treats them like cattle (move along little doggy… can’t graze on this land) of course they are going to drink and do what ever it takes to numb themselves to the fact that they are not cared about, their not wanted, they have lost everything they ever had and they have no hope of things ever changing for them. Dogs in dog pounds get better treatment. You can blame all of the government for this.
Fact is the RICH are getting Richer and the POOR are getting poorer and it is at an accelerated rate. I suggest you all have a tent ready because you could be next. All it takes is one thing to go wrong in your life i.e. an illness, an accident, loss of job… and you will be living in a tent too. The government needs to quit giving the rich tax breaks and stop balancing budgets on the backs of the poor and middle class.
One more thing…. Why don’t they just give them the FEMA trailers that they are selling off?
Posted by Sharon Blasingame on 04/19/2009 @ 01:57PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
You're so right Sharon! Give them the FEMA trailers.......... this is a national emergency! What is going on here? Does a major earthquake need to happen again in California? This time Governor of California and Mayor of Sacremento get prepared for the catastrophy awaiting to happen!
Posted by Mary Acosta on 04/21/2009 @ 10:41AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The FEMA trailers have been found to be highly toxic due to their high levels of formaldehyde gas. However, the construction of low income housing is something that should be considered. There are millions of people in this country who are only a few paychecks away from becoming homeless. Kevin Johnson is obviously looking forward to his next election and really doesn't care about a few hundred homeless people living in his city. Unfortunately, this next time next year it may be in the thousands instead of in the hundreds.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14011193/
Posted by Matthew Cloner on 04/21/2009 @ 04:52PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Got to the bottom of the comments.
Thank you Sharon, for stating the obvious.
I'm struggling to make enough to pay my property taxes.
Savings, will be gone, if this "recession" last more then two years!
Then I might be one of the Homeless along with my husband.
Luckily I have a trusted partner to keep me company. So we can watch each others back. Our Age will put us at a disadvantage, but our background will help us face the "adventure".
Posted by Scooter C on 04/19/2009 @ 05:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
at least they're not roaming the streets. If those who write laws can't help these people, then change the laws. I like the idea of Yurts, but those are non-permanent structures and would probably be considered "camping" as well.
How bout just letting people live how they want or need?
Posted by Jonathan Westbay on 04/19/2009 @ 10:30PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
This is a good example of why people want government out of the people's personal business. This is our land and we have every right to camp out on it, need be. If it makes the "authorities" uncomfortable maybe it will speed their solution to the situation. Home foreclosures need to be dealt with.
Posted by CherokeeGirl for Change on 04/20/2009 @ 04:10PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Three squares and a bed for people who have broken the law...We just can't help out the ones who haven't. In the blink of an eye, everything can change for any on of us. With all of the vacant buildings sitting on every other corner, I would think that there would be somewhere for these people to be. What about the closed Military bases. There has to be a solution to help those who are in need.
Posted by Terri Yparrea on 04/20/2009 @ 04:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
As if these people didn't have it hard enough already! Mayor Johnson shuold be ashamed of himself. How does he sleep at night afer tormenting the citizens he's supposed to be leading and protecting?
Posted by Meredith Donahue on 04/21/2009 @ 01:12AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
World leader’s religious leaders, none of them want to get on, all they want is to control everyone, all claim to have the right and the answer, and all make the people pay in some way shape or form.
People are individuals why do these political and religious leaders always want to lead them telling them how it is. Further to this, where is it that they lead the people? Repression, wars, dysfunction and the resulting environmental and human impact
The world and the life upon it cannot be owned, neither can God, no man or woman is given direct ownership on anything other than themselves, it is self accountability that is the answer to rules and regulations along with respect for another’s freedom, expression and individualism. All of these leaders tell you/us/me how it is, how they see it. This always seems to include their foolish greed and vast amounts of power and control, but not the people.
We/you/I the people, all beings of the Earth have sovereignty of the planet, so why are the governments, industry and the religious leaders allowed to continue in this fashion? Who gives them the right or the power of Rule?
</param></param></param></embed>
A questions on the world economy
Where is all the money? It doesn't seem to have been kept safe in the banks, so where has it gone?
Who has taken it?
Is it out of circulation?
With the up comming budget, what will they spend more of your money on whilst services are being cut?
Who are you helping, who are you bailing out?
What is the long term plan?
A legal undertaking has been entered into regarding the reduction of CO2 emmissions.
What plans do the goernment have regarding investment into green energy, where are the plans for the new drive of industry?
</param></param></param></embed>
</param></param></param></embed>
Posted by PEACEfestUK PEACEfestUK on 04/21/2009 @ 04:27PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
As someone who has personally experienced homelessness, I have a very tough time finding anything funny or amusing concerning this subject. However, over the past week or so the comicstrip "Doonesbury" has been running a series of panels centered around this very issue. Leave it to Garry Trudeau to find humor in the most depressing of subjects. I'm still laughing!
http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/
If we can maintain a sense of humor - even during the worst of times - then we can survive anything.
Posted by Matthew Cloner on 04/23/2009 @ 01:57PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Matthew, you might enjoy this too then.
Above I'd writted about a homeless friend who fasted for economic rights in 2003 from a tent in Chapel Hill, NC. His protest was followed in the next year by the creation of the Center for Poverty Work and Opportunity.
When Trudeau drew the cartoon below he was not to know that a year earlier, the homeless protester had delivered just such a strategy proposal to the US Senate, advocating investment in microfinance and social enterprise weighed against the cost of war in Iraq.
http://p-ced.com/forum/index.php?topic=34.0
http://www.p-ced.com/projects/ukraine/national/
Posted by Jeff Mowatt on 05/08/2009 @ 12:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The solution is to scale back the tax "relief" for the rich, and end the 30+ year chain of corporate welfare that has cost us billions of dollars per year, much of which has been used to export our jobs to foreign countries. Use the savings to restore a legitimate social safety net, like the more modern (and successful) nations have today, and to create a new job market that actually (gasp!) puts responsibilities, rules and requirements on corporations.
Posted by DH Fabian on 05/20/2009 @ 08:44AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.