The Audacity of Home
Published November 20, 2009 @ 09:12AM PT
If there were ever a time for the Obama Administration to fulfill its promise of restoring Hope for America, re-prioritizing the promise of "a Home for all" is the ideal start. The sum of our devastating housing and economic crisis, combined with the recent findings from the international human rights community, prove that there is no better time to move housing to the top of the federal policy agenda.
Today, I'm taking a step back. Away from the details in the news, away from the constant flow of comments, the banter. Today I want to talk about something so simple, so basic that most of us take it for granted.
Home.
A Home is a basic necessity. Something so basic that it's easy to forget. We see homeless people, we hear about programs designed to serve them, we read the news of the worsening crisis. Yet we're desensitized to the severe psychological implications of not having a home. We're numb.
A Home helps to ensure safety, health, and well-being. It is our base, a place we can always return to. We identify with our Home - with the structure we live in, the town and state it's in, the schools it's near. A Home is safety, it is opportunity. For many people, it is even identity. It is not far-fetched to say that our ability to hope is directly related to having a Home.
Last week, the special United Nations rapporteur on housing concluded that we, as a country, have "shamefully neglected" our homeless while concurrently pumping billions of dollars to big businesses. This report arrived on the heels of a record-setting foreclosure crisis and just as unemployment rates hit the double-digits.
Nestled within these large, complex issues are varying layers of tragedy. State finances are in disarray, resulting in cuts in services to critical to meeting the needs of the homeless. Services to the mentally ill, drug and alcohol addicts, and victims of domestic violence have dwindled. Washington D.C., Massachusetts, and California - among many others - are slashing homeless service budgets, resulting in lost shelter beds, fewer shelter workers, and ultimately a reduction in services.
At the same time, other entities - many not accustomed to serving the homeless - are being forced to respond to the crisis. Schools across the country are fighting to keep the growing numbers of homeless children from falling behind their classmates. City councils are wrestling with growing numbers of tent cities, attempting to balance the housing needs of community members with important public safety issues.
The sum of all these issues results in a greater number of people who experience the trauma and the pain of losing a piece of their identify - their home. Many of these individuals will never be counted. They stay hidden; in cars, on friend's couches, in tents in the woods. They may never enter "the system," maybe because there aren't enough resources or maybe because they have too much pride to ask for help. You see, just as the word "home" carries a greater significance, being "homeless" has its own negative implications.
If there were ever a time for the Obama Administration to fulfill its promise of restoring Hope, re-prioritizing the promise of a Home for all would be the ideal start. The sum of these crisis, combined with the findings from the UN, prove that there is no better time to move housing to the top of the federal policy agenda.
Yes, this crisis is bad. But the greater tragedy will be if we learn nothing from this crisis. If we don't re-evaluate the importance of Home, the accessibility of Home to all who need it. If we don't re-prioritize housing in this, the wealthiest, most powerful nation in the world, that will be the real tragedy.

Images: j9marshall, papalar and dandeluca
Related Posts
-
The 10 Most Notable Homelessness Stories of 2009
-
5 Reasons to Feel Hopeful in 2010
-
The 5 Most Shocking Homelessness Stories of 2009
Comments (6)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Email


Great post, Shannon, and a perfect time to remind all Americans that what most of us take for granted--our humble abode--is increasingly out of reach to families and individuals, those who have worked hard all their lives and those who cannot, for a number of reasons, work to keep a roof over their heads.
I'd add, it's a perfect time to restructure our national approach (or lack thereof) to poverty.
Happy Thanks-giving, a great time to give thanks and to give of your bounty!
Posted by HEAR US on 11/22/2009 @ 07:48AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Well in terms of HAMP, it is a very slow, very painful, very stressful, waiting game-- but more people who had temporary modifications ARE getting finalizing documents to maintain the new terms.
I'm thankful for the program...
my paperwork came from litton loans, and I found out to my horror that Deutche Bank was the "investor" and that it had been bundled as part of a servicing and pool agreement. That was fairly nerve wracking since a lot of people have been wrongfully denied modifications, with JUST either of those things, being the supposed "reason".
I had a fixed rate, but when I lost income it didn't much matter. I'm blessed in a way because I have other unearned income to pay with. I'd been messed up in the first place because New Century had thrown in an escrow waiver, which the original proposal did NOT contain. So I thought I had everything covered at one price, but I didn't. I needed to come up with that mortgage, PLUS insurance, PLUS taxes, Plus HOA-- which all ran about 300/mo MORE than the mortgage, which was about what I could afford IF everything was included. It has been a big struggle for me and I am so thankful that I am getting a reprieve from some of that stress. I should now be able to pay for some other things, like a new water heater and some repairs for my porch. That is what they don't think about when they charge so much money, what about the costs of keeping the place up? Who has that, when they can't even pay all the taxes and make all the mortgage payments?
HAMP WILL WORK, but homeowners should have a lot more protections including things like forgiveness of ALL charges owed at the end of the LONG DRAWN OUT trial modifications. I do lose about 5K in terms of the added costs to what I owe them now AND I also had the maturity date extended several months. BUT they were, (is this ME talking?) DECENT to me in terms of what they counted and what they didn't. The trial mod, had included my child support, but the final mod, didn't so my payments are now even lower. I did the happy dance all over my kitchen. But it was frustrating, lost documents, getting told to send the same thing over and over, only to find, they actually wanted something very specific, but the form letters had, of course, FAILED TO CONVEY what they were looking for, in fact. AND the department LOSS MITIGATION, refuses to have DIRECT CONTACT with the homeowner, SO, it is like playing telephone, very inefficient, very frustrating. I was having nightmares and would wake up saying my property address and phone numbers, or having just gotten denied, it was really horrible frightening experience, where I knew the denials happen if they figure foreclosure is more cost effective, but they do drag it out for some, only TO deny. So until this thing is actually RECORDED, I guess I'm going to just be guardedly optimistic, that it is really happening.
Posted by Cee Wolfe on 11/26/2009 @ 08:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Child support should never be calculated in. Good luck. Renting rooms is becoming very necessary for people to stay in their homes and for both parties it is a win win as long as references check out. We rented to a young college student years back and it worked for the year very well; then to a grandma who was on a waiting list for a retirement home!
Posted by Jennifer Perugini on 11/30/2009 @ 08:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Want to help the economy? think you can? well I think we all can and here's how.....check out the video I viewed today at http://potforfreedom.com/ and once you've made it there, check out video and documentary, view the video "the hemp revolution" it's an hour long and I didn't think I'd watch it all either... but I did. Once you've seen that come on back and sign my petition at www.change.org/actions/view/join_the_hemp_revolution. Medical marijuana is the first step in changing all the negativity surrounding this natural plant that has many uses. NOW THAT WE KNOW THE DIFFERENCE, LET'S BE THE DIFFERENCE.
Posted by john n newman on 12/05/2009 @ 03:35PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Hi Jennifer,
I've always shared my home with others. Every bedroom has been a safe haven for someone or another, ever since I bought the home, because there is always someone who needs a place to call home, even if for just a while along their way. This is true more than ever now, with so many people being robbed of their homes, by those who benefited from their contibuting tax dollars, when they WERE working. That is what is still wrong with the HAMP program, we need a bridge program, or maybe a program that lets the homeowners LEASE the home they are in AT THE CURRENT MARKET RATE, rather than pay through the nose still, for housing that has failed to retain much value. Heard in Detroit they cannot even GIVE away the houses they foreclosed on, so why have housing sit, empty and abandonned when so many now need housing so desperately? It is a crazy system, capitalism and it is not working for any but a very few. Heard about how the average Goldman Sachs salary for around 31,000 execs, is STILL 700,000/year. Interesting...
Posted by Cee Wolfe on 12/11/2009 @ 05:58PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
No more housing programs please. Fannie and Freddie already helped create the largest housing bubble in US history. The goal was to make housing more affordable but instead prices rose faster than ever before in the history of the United States. It was a total failure.
It doesn't make any sense that you couldn't give away a house. That nobody would take it for free. Even if it was true that they can't give em away in Detroit (I think it's complete BS) there wouldn't even be a need for a housing program because there are free ones lying around. Why lease a house when somebody is giving them away? Detroit also has 50% unemployment, they sure ran that city into the toilet.
The truth is that the banks don't want to unload the properties because they would have to write down the losses. Most of the major banks in the country are insolvent. The government changed the accounting rules so banks could pretend that their assets are worth more than they actually are. Then they record record profits from what would amount to accounting fraud a year ago and pay themselves huge bonuses. The banking system is completely corrupt and they make up the rules as they go along. Obama is perusing the Bush agenda, Change is a cliche campaign slogan. I'm glad people like Jon Stewart on the left are waking up to some of this nonsense.
Posted by Jeremy Osell on 12/21/2009 @ 05:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.